A proposal, an AI explanation, or a technical plan each needs different questions. Start with the work you have and give the reviewers a specific job.
Two free Refinement reviews each month · Other formats require paid or prepaid access
Include the draft, the question you need answered, and the context that could change the answer. A specific request gives the reviewers something concrete to examine.
The examples below suggest what to bring and what to ask. Use the findings to revise the work or prepare questions for the person making the decision.
Check the assumptions behind a recommendation.
Bring the proposal, its goal, expected costs, and the alternatives you considered. Include the constraints that would rule an option out.
Ask reviewers what must be true for the proposal to work, which alternative deserves consideration, and what evidence would change the recommendation.
Find claims that need evidence before you repeat them.
Paste the answer, the original question, and any sources it cites. Tell the reviewers how you plan to use the answer.
Ask for unsupported claims, contradictions, and missing context. Use the findings to check the original sources; model agreement alone does not verify a fact.
Look for failure cases before implementation.
Bring the design, requirements, dependencies, and rollout plan. Include expected traffic, failure tolerance, and migration constraints when relevant.
Ask reviewers to challenge reliability, security, rollback, and cost assumptions. Turn useful findings into tests or questions for the engineering review.
Keep the disagreement between sources visible.
Provide the relevant source material and the question you are trying to answer. Include contradictory findings instead of only the evidence supporting your view.
Ask which claims the sources support, where methods or populations differ, and what remains uncertain. Check quotations and conclusions against the original material.
Bring a clearer issue list to counsel.
Provide the relevant clauses, definitions, cross-references, and commercial context. State what the agreement needs to accomplish.
Ask for conflicting terms, ambiguous obligations, and alternative interpretations. A qualified legal reviewer must assess the findings before you rely on them.
Identify the assumptions that could change the case.
Bring the thesis, supporting data, time horizon, and downside assumptions. Include the sources and dates behind important figures.
Ask for a credible opposing case, missing risks, and conditions that would invalidate the thesis. Verify the figures and review the findings with the responsible investor or adviser.
Bring a draft and a question you need help examining. Start with Refinement for general feedback, then choose a more focused format when you need it.
