Find contract questions to take to counsel.
Review relevant clauses for ambiguity, conflicting terms, and missing context. Use the findings to prepare a clearer discussion with a qualified legal reviewer.
Two free Refinement reviews each month · No credit card required
A clause depends on the agreement around it.
Include definitions, cross-references, exceptions, and the commercial purpose of the agreement. An isolated clause may be interpreted differently in its full context.
Ask reviewers to quote the affected language and explain competing readings. A qualified legal reviewer must assess the legal effect and decide whether changes are appropriate.
What to look for in the review.
Compare related terms
Look for obligations or exceptions that appear inconsistent.
Identify ambiguity
Ask which wording could support more than one interpretation.
Prepare an issue list
Bring the relevant language and questions to counsel for assessment.
Review the clause in its legal and operational neighborhood
The table shows how a disciplined issue-spotting pass moves from surface wording to the interaction that may change real obligations.
| Review surface | Shallow clause summary | Adversarial issue spot |
|---|---|---|
| Definitions | Restates the defined term | Tests scope, circularity, exclusions, and inconsistent use |
| Obligation | Lists what a party must do | Tests trigger, standard, dependency, evidence, and deadline |
| Exception | Notes that exceptions exist | Checks whether the exception swallows the rule or conflicts elsewhere |
| Remedy | Summarizes available relief | Connects breach, cure, termination, indemnity, and liability limits |
| Precedence | Mentions incorporated documents | Finds which term controls when schedules or policies conflict |
| Operations | Treats performance as drafting | Checks whether teams and systems can actually satisfy the obligation |
| Missing context | Produces a confident reading | Blocks interpretation pending governing law or absent attachments |
Prepare a useful review.
Give reviewers a clear question and enough context to examine it.
Start with definitions and precedence
Before evaluating obligations, identify where defined terms, schedules, order forms, policies, and amendments control.
Map trigger to remedy
For each material obligation, trace the trigger, deadline, performance standard, evidence, cure right, termination consequence, indemnity, and liability treatment.
Issue spotting is not legal advice, privilege, or contract approval.
Models can miss controlling law, negotiation history, attachments, specialized doctrine, and facts outside the document. They can also invent authority or overstate a plausible reading. Qualified counsel must verify the text, context, jurisdiction, and legal consequence before anyone relies on the output.
Contract material may be confidential, privileged, regulated, or subject to data-processing restrictions. Confirm authorization and vendor terms before upload, redact unnecessary personal or commercial information, and follow your organization’s retention and access rules. Do not assume using an AI review preserves privilege.
What to know before you run the panel
Can RigorDesk tell me whether a contract is safe to sign?
No. It can produce a structured issue list, competing readings, missing-context flags, and questions for counsel or the business owner. Only an authorized, qualified person with the complete agreement and relevant facts should advise on signature or legal exposure.
Should I provide the whole agreement or one clause?
Provide the whole authorized document when cross-references, definitions, precedence, remedies, or schedules matter. If you provide one clause, state that the review is provisional and include the surrounding definitions and provisions needed to understand its operation.
Does agreement mean the answer is correct?
No. Models can repeat the same mistake or rely on the same weak source. Read the objections and check important claims against evidence.
Why use other models instead of asking one to critique itself?
Self-critique can help. Other models and specific review roles provide additional responses to compare. The format determines whether reviewers begin independently or see earlier answers.
Does this replace human review?
No. Use the findings to improve a draft or prepare questions for a responsible reviewer. The models do not approve a decision or verify every claim.
Bring your next draft.
Create a free account to draft or import your work. Choose the reviewers and settings before starting a review.